IMG PSL 7.62x54R 10rd Rifle Polymer Magazine

construction looks good. feeds OK for right now. had to do some minor adjustment on the locking tab on the rear of the magazine. not a major fix minor filling.

I purchased a pair of the new polymer PSL mags to sample. $30/ea. I was skeptical. Initial insert on both of them was VERY tight and I practically needed a mallet to pound it out of the receiver with one hand while holding the mag release with the other. After that they fit beautifully. BETTER, in fact, than the random unmatched steel PSL mags I have. Are they combat worthy? Will they still fit, loosen up or misshape after a 100, a 1,000 in/outs? Dunno. I'll keep an eye on it. But I now actually prefer these - FWIW.

I bought 2 a d dont regret it!These magazines work well and are very economical.They fit snug and have no magazine slop.Double check the magazines for extra plastic on seams and along the underside of the feed lips.I ran steel,lacquered,and brass rounds through the mags with no issues.After the first 50 rounds in each mag, you will see the indentions from the bolt and bolt hold-open; file those down with a little sandpaper so feeding will be extra smooth.My hold-open tabs worked half the time.Dealbreaker?Nope.Maybe an improvement could be a harder plastic follower or a steel follower.Great mags!I will be getting 2 more and pass on the word to my local ammo stores a d community.Yea, they won't even sell the steel OEM mags because they cost $70-80 a pop.

Just received 5 in the mail (after buying 4 surplus mags of course). Fit in the gun fine, a little snug attaching and detaching the magazines but nothing that regular use shouldn’t solve. Cycles by hand just fine, slight hang ups but not enough to stop the bolt and still went into battery every time. Haven’t been to the range to live fire test them yet but I suspect that they will work just fine and wear in over a short period of time. Definitely a great buy and let’s us PSL shooters have a chance at obtaining a few spare magazines to keep us shooting. Overall great buy for the money, just need to wear them in slightly!

I bought two of these for my PSL and took them out to the range. Cycled roughly 8 magazines worth total between the two. Had one issue with a cartridge rim getting stuck on the top tab causing a failure to feed, but pulling the mag, resetting the round, and putting it back in it went fine again. One thing to note is the plastic tabs behind the front block are notching from the rounds hitting it. It hasn't caused a problem yet but might be an issue for longevity. Overall for the cost these are definitely worth it and I don't regret buying them.

was pleasantly surprised with these. ive got 4 PSL's & they snapped right into everyone of them & hand cycled thru with no problems. live fire is next. for the price of these mags? if they stay solid thru upcoming use? they were worth the price for sure!

These are a bit larger than their steel counterparts. I also had to file the back tab. Took about a half hour, but fits snug. Seems to be a decent polymer. Worked well at the range. Not great, but not terrible.

This magazine out of the bag would not fit into my PSL. After filing down the front tab, and a notch in the back for the bolt hold open to allow the magazine to be seated it fits snugly (a 30 minute process overall). The build construction of these magazines appears to be relatively high quality, with the profile being slightly larger in most dimensions than their steel counterparts. I have had issues with a fully loaded magazine feeding the first round just below the chamber and jamming, however rounds #2-10 feed flawlessly. Overall I would recommend this for people, but I consider these more of a 9 round magazine than a 10 rounder due to the struggles of the first round feeding.